Jonas Leo
Red Bull junior driver Isack Hadjar recently reflected on a pivotal period in his development, specifically addressing the intensive simulator work in the lead-up to the Miami Grand Prix where he faced a significant performance disparity compared to reigning Formula 1 World Champion Max Verstappen. While Hadjar’s initial simulator sessions with Red Bull had shown considerable promise, including a simulated third-place grid position in Australia and even out-qualifying Verstappen in Japan’s virtual environment, the Miami preparation marked a stark "reality check" for the aspiring French talent.
Hadjar, currently competing in the FIA Formula 2 Championship with Campos Racing, is a key component of the Red Bull Junior Team, undergoing rigorous development to potentially advance to Formula 1. A critical part of this preparation involves extensive simulator time, where drivers test car setups, evaluate upgrades, and benchmark their performance against the team’s established F1 drivers, most notably Verstappen. It was within this demanding simulated environment that the Miami weekend’s challenges unfolded.
During the simulated Miami Grand Prix sessions, Hadjar found himself consistently around eight tenths of a second per lap slower than Verstappen. The session culminated in a simulated crash during what would have been Sunday’s race, triggering a visibly frustrated reaction from Hadjar, who was observed repeatedly hitting the steering wheel before exiting his virtual RB22 cockpit. This level of visible emotion, even in a simulated environment, underscored the intense pressure and high stakes associated with performance within the Red Bull ecosystem.
"I was just pissed off at myself, a lack of focus, because everything was going well before that," Hadjar stated, elaborating on his reaction to the simulator incident. He explained the frustration stemmed from a missed opportunity for a strong virtual performance. "We had the right tyres on and overtaking was good. It was clear that we were ending up in the points and I just wanted to go all-in for that race." Having started from a disadvantaged position due to a simulated disqualification, Hadjar emphasized his eagerness to maximize the learning experience. "Started last, you get disqualified, so I wanted to also have fun, overtake and learn stuff. And I couldn’t because I made a mistake, so I was really [pissed], and I’m still pissed."
Related News :
- Lindblad Defies Rookie Pressure, Thrives in F1 Debut Season with Racing Bulls
- Formula 1 prepares for its inaugural 2026 car shakedown in Barcelona, amidst regulatory uncertainty and a tightly controlled testing environment.
- ‘Stop beating yourself up,’ Haas tells Oliver Bearman after 50G Suzuka crash
- Montreal’s Grand Prix Weekend Poised for Labour Dispute as Exotic Dancers Announce Strategic Strike
- McLaren’s Internal Driver Policy Under Scrutiny, Piastri Offers Insight Ahead of 2026 Campaign
Despite the lingering frustration from the Miami simulator experience, Hadjar stressed the invaluable lessons derived from the setback. He indicated that the "beating up" by Verstappen’s simulated pace was instrumental not only in identifying specific areas where his virtual performance lacked but also in developing a more robust psychological approach to adversity. "I definitely learned from the weekend where I got kind of beaten up. I do have to say that I learned many things, also how to react when things go wrong," he explained, highlighting the importance of mental resilience in high-performance motorsport. "I think I didn’t really do a good job in Miami and I learned from it. And I’ll start again this weekend with more experience."
The incident in Miami’s simulator came at a significant juncture for the Red Bull F1 team’s development. Following an initial upgrade package introduced in Japan that did not yield the anticipated performance gains, the team brought a substantial revision to Miami. This included their interpretation of a "Macarena wing" and heavily revised sidepods, designed to enhance aerodynamic efficiency and overall car performance. While Verstappen has consistently demonstrated the RB20’s formidable capabilities on track, the continuous pursuit of marginal gains through development is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge.
Hadjar, despite his personal struggles in the simulator, expressed confidence in the team’s development trajectory. "I did not really have doubts about the team," Hadjar told Motorsport.com, commenting on the upgrades. "I think starting the year, it’s no secret that some teams started the project earlier than we did, and it showed in the first few weekends." He acknowledged the impact of the new components: "But the upgrade definitely surprised me and many people in the paddock. I think this was definitely pretty impressive on our side, but we expect even more for the future." This perspective underscores the iterative nature of Formula 1 development, where simulator work is vital for validating new parts before their track deployment.
An additional factor that may have influenced Verstappen’s on-track performance in Miami, and potentially his simulator feedback, was a previously undisclosed issue with the steering system. Verstappen, renowned for his acute sensitivity to car dynamics, revealed to Dutch media that Red Bull had identified and subsequently rectified a steering problem that he had been experiencing since the Barcelona shakedown. Addressing this issue provided the four-time world champion with increased confidence to push the car to its limits.
However, Hadjar confirmed that this specific steering issue did not affect his simulator work or his perception of the RB22. "I didn’t have the same. We didn’t use the same new column, the same system for Miami. And to be honest, I didn’t feel what he was feeling," Hadjar explained from Montreal. His observation further highlighted Verstappen’s unique ability to detect minute discrepancies in car behavior. "It shows how sensitive he is to things and he knows what he wants for himself, so it’s very impressive." This distinction underscores the nuanced differences between actual F1 car characteristics and simulator configurations, even within the same team’s development program.
The subsequent simulator sessions, specifically in preparation for the Canadian Grand Prix in Montreal, indicated that Hadjar had indeed absorbed the lessons from Miami. During sprint qualifying simulations for Montreal, Hadjar demonstrated a considerably tighter performance gap to Verstappen, narrowing it to just one tenth of a second. While a fourth-row simulated grid position is not the ultimate target for Red Bull, the significant reduction in the performance delta signals a positive trajectory for Hadjar’s development. This improved showing suggests a successful application of the insights gained from the Miami experience, both in terms of understanding vehicle dynamics and managing personal focus under pressure.
For Hadjar, these simulator experiences are crucial stepping stones in his journey toward Formula 1. The intense benchmarking against a driver of Verstappen’s calibre provides an unparalleled learning environment, forcing young talents to confront their weaknesses and refine their approach. The "beating up" in Miami, therefore, was not merely a setback but a concentrated learning opportunity, offering valuable insights into the relentless pursuit of perfection required at the pinnacle of motorsport. As Hadjar continues his F2 campaign and further simulator duties, the ability to adapt, learn, and improve from such challenging experiences will be paramount for his long-term prospects within the Red Bull driver development program.
💬 Tinggalkan Komentar dengan Facebook
Author Profile
- Jonas Leo is a passionate motorsport journalist and lifelong Formula 1 enthusiast. With a sharp eye for race strategy and driver performance, he brings readers closer to the world of Grand Prix racing through in-depth analysis, breaking news, and exclusive paddock insights. Jonas has covered everything from preseason testing to dramatic title deciders, capturing the emotion and precision that define modern F1. When he’s not tracking lap times or pit stop tactics, he enjoys exploring classic racing archives and writing about the evolution of F1 technology.
Latest entries
F1May 23, 2026Isack Hadjar Unpacks Key Learning Points from Challenging Miami Simulator Sessions Against Max Verstappen.
F1May 23, 2026Intra-Team Qualifying Dynamics Unpacked After F1 2026 Canadian Grand Prix
F1May 23, 2026Circuit Gilles Villeneuve Poses Distinct Two-Halves Energy Challenge, Explains Jolyon Palmer
F1May 23, 2026Red Bull’s Montreal Momentum Stalled as Verstappen Grapples with Unprecedented Car Instability
Ali Akbar Rosady
arthur roy sitompul
Anshari Taslim
rifan muazin