Jonas Leo
Woking-based Formula 1 team McLaren is grappling with a profound strategic dilemma regarding its championship aspirations following a challenging Las Vegas Grand Prix. A double disqualification for both Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri due to excessive plank wear plunged the team into a crisis, allowing Red Bull Racing’s Max Verstappen to significantly narrow the points gap to Norris, now just 24 points behind the championship leader. Piastri, McLaren’s rookie sensation, also finds himself level on points with Verstappen, further complicating the internal dynamics ahead of the season’s final two rounds. The critical question now facing the Woking outfit is whether it should abandon its long-standing policy of equal opportunity and explicitly back Lando Norris in the pursuit of the Formula 1 Drivers’ World Championship.
The Las Vegas Grand Prix proved to be a bitter pill for McLaren. What could have been a strong points haul, potentially extending Norris’s championship lead, turned into a zero-score event. Both MCL38 cars were found to have excessive wear on their underfloor planks, a breach of technical regulations that led to their immediate disqualification. This setback was particularly damaging as it came after a victory for Max Verstappen, who capitalized on McLaren’s misfortune to reignite his title challenge. The incident not only cost McLaren valuable championship points but also prompted an apology from the team to its fervent fanbase and commercial partners, underscoring the high stakes and the pressure now mounting on the team principal Andrea Stella and CEO Zak Brown.
The debate within the Formula 1 paddock, and indeed within McLaren’s own walls, centers on the inherent fairness and practical implications of implementing team orders. Traditionally, McLaren has maintained a policy of allowing its drivers to compete freely, particularly when both retain a mathematical chance at the title. Zak Brown, McLaren’s CEO, had previously articulated this stance, stating that as long as both drivers were within the equivalent of one race win (25 points) of each other, no favoritism would be shown. This philosophy, echoed by Team Principal Andrea Stella, emphasized a commitment to "fairness" and a "willingness to take risks" in pursuit of pure racing. Proponents of maintaining this parity point to historical precedents, such as the tumultuous 2007 season where McLaren’s internal rivalry between Fernando Alonso and Lewis Hamilton arguably cost them the championship, suggesting that imposing team orders can be detrimental to team cohesion and individual driver morale.
Ronald Vording, a motorsports analyst, argues against intervention, highlighting the consistent application of McLaren’s policy. He notes that when Oscar Piastri was leading the championship earlier in the season, Norris was not asked to yield, and the same principle should apply to Piastri now. Vording suggests that asking Piastri and his manager, Mark Webber, to play a supporting role would be a complex and potentially contentious request, especially given Piastri’s own championship standing, currently tied with Verstappen. He further points out that Norris still holds his destiny in his own hands, particularly with the upcoming Qatar Grand Prix, a circuit widely believed to suit the McLaren car’s characteristics. If Norris performs as expected in Qatar, he could potentially secure the title without any direct assistance from his teammate. For Vording, the ultimate goal is a McLaren driver winning the title, but this should ideally be achieved without compromising the competitive spirit or alienating either driver. Ben Vinel adds to this perspective, emphasizing an "unspoken rule" in F1 against imposing team orders when both drivers are mathematically in contention. He cites the long-term damage to a driver’s self-esteem and sense of belonging, referencing the enduring negative sentiments of drivers like Rubens Barrichello and Felipe Massa who were famously subjected to team orders. Vinel posits that preserving the relationship with a promising talent like Piastri for future seasons might outweigh the immediate, albeit uncertain, benefit of a few extra points for Norris. Filip Cleeren echoes this sentiment, believing that McLaren’s natural performance advantage at the Losail circuit in Qatar might render team orders unnecessary for at least the next round. He stresses that Piastri’s current position, tied with Verstappen, makes it difficult to justify asking him to sacrifice his own aspirations. The situation could be re-evaluated for the final race in Abu Dhabi if Piastri is mathematically out of contention by then.
Related News :
- Piastri Affirms Robust McLaren Partnership with Norris Amidst Intense Championship Battle
- Liberty Media Announces Leadership Transition: John Malone Steps Down as Chairman, Robert Bennett Named Successor
- Mercedes’ George Russell Masters Shifting Conditions to Lead Final Las Vegas GP Practice, McLaren Hit by Technical Glitches
- McLaren CEO Zak Brown Emphasizes Clinical Approach Amidst Intensifying F1 Title Battle
- Piastri’s Las Vegas Livery Nods to Early RC Racing Triumphs Ahead of Crucial F1 Weekend.
Conversely, Oleg Karpov presents a compelling case for McLaren to adopt a more pragmatic and decisive approach. He argues that while outright "taking parts" from one car to favor another is not feasible in modern F1, subtle strategic prioritization is both possible and necessary. Karpov suggests that McLaren must proactively assess scenarios where Norris could be given priority, acknowledging his current stronger position as the leading McLaren driver. He highlights that Norris has arguably "earned" this support, having suffered a mechanical retirement at Zandvoort and losing more points than Piastri in the Las Vegas disqualification. With these 36 lost points, Norris would have been a dominant favorite heading into Qatar, virtually nullifying Verstappen’s threat.
Karpov emphasizes Norris’s demonstrated ability to handle championship pressure and his status as "McLaren’s best driver right now." He advocates for setting clear "ground rules" for Qatar, where securing Norris’s title should be the paramount objective, even if it entails sacrificing Piastri’s race. The championship, as this season has demonstrated, is susceptible to "freak circumstances" such as start-line incidents or unforeseen technical failures. Relying on Verstappen not winning the final races is not a viable strategy. Therefore, a proactive approach to clinch the title is critical. Karpov provocatively suggests that Piastri’s recent dip in form has contributed to McLaren’s precarious position, implying a responsibility to cooperate if his assistance is needed. This could manifest in small, yet crucial, actions such as forcing Verstappen into a sub-optimal strategy or holding him off for a critical number of laps. While acknowledging that Piastri’s natural performance should not be suppressed, Karpov concludes that if Piastri continues to struggle, McLaren should not "bet on a tired horse," and common sense must prevail to secure the championship for the team, moving past rigid internal policies.
As the Formula 1 circus heads to Qatar, McLaren faces a pivotal moment. The decision of whether to maintain internal parity or to throw its full weight behind Lando Norris will undoubtedly shape the outcome of this fiercely contested championship and define McLaren’s internal ethos for seasons to come. The stakes are unequivocally high, demanding a calculated and potentially controversial choice from the Woking leadership.
💬 Tinggalkan Komentar dengan Facebook
Author Profile
- Jonas Leo is a passionate motorsport journalist and lifelong Formula 1 enthusiast. With a sharp eye for race strategy and driver performance, he brings readers closer to the world of Grand Prix racing through in-depth analysis, breaking news, and exclusive paddock insights. Jonas has covered everything from preseason testing to dramatic title deciders, capturing the emotion and precision that define modern F1. When he’s not tracking lap times or pit stop tactics, he enjoys exploring classic racing archives and writing about the evolution of F1 technology.
Latest entries
F1November 25, 2025McLaren Confronts Urgent Strategic Decisions Amidst Intensifying F1 Title Battle for Lando Norris
F1November 25, 2025George Russell’s Las Vegas GP Podium Marred by Persistent Steering Malfunction and Tyre Struggles
F1November 24, 2025MotoGP CEO Carmelo Ezpeleta Considers Integrating Select Formula 1 Street Circuits, Emphasizing Rider Safety
F1November 24, 2025McLaren’s Las Vegas Disqualification Dramatically Tightens Championship Battle, Bolstering Verstappen’s Title Odds
Ali Akbar Rosady
arthur roy sitompul
Anshari Taslim
rifan muazin
alina maya