Acosta Gambles with Electronics Setup for Malaysian GP Podium Finish

Sepang, Malaysia – Red Bull KTM Factory Racing rider Pedro Acosta secured a surprising second-place finish at the Malaysian Grand Prix, attributing his success to a bold decision to override the team’s standard electronics configuration for tire management. The 21-year-old Spaniard, who has struggled with excessive tire degradation throughout the season, confessed that his podium finish hinged on a high-stakes gamble that could have easily backfired.

Acosta’s performance at Sepang marked only his second podium in the last three races, following a similar runner-up position at the Indonesian Grand Prix. Prior to the race weekend, few expected Acosta to contend for a podium spot, especially given the notorious Sepang International Circuit, which places heavy demands on tire preservation due to its abrasive surface and sweltering conditions.

Acosta’s Malaysian GP weekend began with mixed signals. During Saturday’s sprint race, he briefly held second position before fading to fourth. This result raised concerns about his ability to maintain competitive pace over the full grand prix distance, particularly with the anticipated increase in track temperatures on Sunday.

However, Acosta and his team made a pivotal decision on Sunday morning. Acknowledging the persistent tire degradation issues that had plagued his RC16 throughout the season, Acosta proposed a radical departure from their usual strategy. Instead of relying on pre-programmed electronic aids to manage tire wear, he advocated for a completely manual approach, placing full control of tire management in his own hands.

Related News :

"Our problem is quite clear," Acosta explained during the post-race press conference. "We [had tried] something that we normally always try, and it was not working, again. I said to the boys, ‘Look, we cannot be worse… let’s go completely in the other direction. And if we f*** up, it’s my fault.’"

This decision involved disabling most of the electronic controls designed to mitigate tire wear, including traction control, wheelie control, and engine braking maps. The intention was to give Acosta greater sensitivity and responsiveness in modulating the throttle, brakes, and riding style to conserve tire life.

In a separate interview, Acosta elaborated on the specifics of the changes, stating, "We removed all the controls. I asked them to take everything off, as if it were a normal race, where there was no tire wear. And I managed it as best I could, with the throttle, the brakes, the pick-ups, the ride height device."

Despite the success of this strategy at Sepang, Acosta cautioned that it would not become a standard procedure. "No, for sure it will not be something that I want to use in the next races," he affirmed.

The decision to revert to a more conventional electronics setup for the remaining races suggests that Acosta and his team view Sepang as an outlier, where the unique track conditions and Acosta’s riding style converged to make the manual approach particularly effective.

The final two rounds of the MotoGP season will take place in Europe, with races scheduled in Portugal and Spain. These circuits typically present cooler conditions and less abrasive surfaces compared to Sepang, potentially rendering the manual tire management strategy less advantageous.

Acosta’s podium finish at Sepang was not the only success story for KTM at the Malaysian Grand Prix. Enea Bastianini, riding for the Tech3 KTM Factory Racing team, also delivered a strong performance, progressing from 19th on the grid to finish second.

Brad Binder, Acosta’s teammate at Red Bull KTM Factory Racing, also made significant progress during the race, advancing from 18th to ninth. However, Pol Espargaro, the fourth KTM rider, crashed out of the race early on.

The Risks and Rewards of Electronic Intervention

In modern MotoGP racing, electronic rider aids play a crucial role in managing motorcycle performance and enhancing rider safety. These systems, developed over decades, can significantly impact tire wear, engine output, and overall bike stability. However, they also have limitations and can, at times, hinder a rider’s ability to adapt to changing track conditions or exploit specific strengths.

Traction control systems, for instance, prevent rear-wheel spin under acceleration, reducing tire wear and improving grip. However, excessive reliance on traction control can also dull throttle response and limit a rider’s ability to use controlled slides to steer the bike.

Wheelie control systems mitigate front-wheel lift during acceleration, maintaining bike stability and optimizing power delivery. However, aggressive wheelie control settings can reduce acceleration in certain situations, especially on corner exits.

Engine braking maps adjust the amount of engine braking available when a rider closes the throttle, influencing bike stability during corner entry. However, improper engine braking settings can cause rear-wheel lockup or excessive chassis instability.

By disabling these systems, Acosta effectively stripped away a layer of electronic intervention, relying instead on his own skill and judgment to manage these critical parameters. This approach demanded exceptional precision and feel, as any miscalculation could result in rapid tire degradation or even a crash.

Acosta’s Calculated Gamble

Acosta’s decision to abandon electronic aids was not simply a reckless act of defiance. It was a calculated gamble based on his assessment of the specific challenges presented by the Sepang circuit and his confidence in his own abilities.

Throughout the season, Acosta has demonstrated a willingness to experiment with different setups and strategies, often pushing the boundaries of conventional wisdom. This adaptability and openness to innovation have been key factors in his development as a MotoGP rider.

While Acosta’s success at Sepang may not represent a universal solution to tire degradation issues, it highlights the importance of rider feedback and the potential benefits of occasionally deviating from established norms.

Implications for the Remainder of the Season

With only two races remaining in the 2024 MotoGP season, Acosta’s podium finish at Sepang has injected renewed momentum into his campaign. While he has downplayed the likelihood of replicating his manual tire management strategy in Portugal and Spain, the experience gained at Sepang may still prove valuable.

The final two races will provide further opportunities for Acosta to refine his riding style, experiment with different setups, and build confidence ahead of the 2025 season. His progress and adaptability will be closely monitored by KTM and other teams, as he continues to establish himself as a rising star in MotoGP.

Other MotoGP Riders Struggle with Tire Management

Tire management has been a recurring theme throughout the 2024 MotoGP season, with numerous riders struggling to maintain consistent performance over full race distances. Factors such as track temperature, surface abrasiveness, and riding style can all significantly impact tire wear.

Some riders prefer a smooth, flowing style that minimizes stress on the tires, while others adopt a more aggressive approach, prioritizing short-term performance over long-term durability. The optimal strategy often depends on the specific characteristics of the circuit and the rider’s individual strengths.

As MotoGP technology continues to evolve, teams are constantly seeking new ways to optimize tire performance through electronics, chassis design, and riding techniques. Acosta’s success at Sepang serves as a reminder that even in the age of sophisticated technology, rider skill and adaptability remain essential components of success.