Van Dijk Refrains from Dwelling on Disallowed Goal Amidst Liverpool's Crushing Defeat.

Manchester, England – Liverpool captain Virgil van Dijk has opted to downplay the controversy surrounding his disallowed goal during their recent Premier League clash against Manchester City at the Etihad Stadium, emphasizing instead the need to address the team’s comprehensive 3-0 defeat. The incident occurred during the match on Sunday, November 9, 2025, and has since sparked considerable debate among pundits and fans alike.

The contentious moment arose in the 39th minute when Van Dijk rose to meet a corner kick, powerfully heading the ball into the back of the net. The goal, which would have leveled the score at 1-1 following Erling Haaland’s earlier opener, was initially celebrated by the Liverpool players and travelling supporters. However, the jubilation was short-lived.

Referee Chris Kavanagh, after a consultation with the Video Assistant Referee (VAR), opted to review the play on the pitch-side monitor. The review focused on the positioning of Liverpool left-back Andy Robertson during the build-up to the goal. Robertson was deemed to be standing in an offside position and, crucially, adjudged to be interfering with play by obstructing the line of sight of Manchester City goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma.

The decision to disallow the goal ignited immediate controversy. Television replays appeared to show Robertson ducking to avoid the path of the ball, leading many to argue that he was not actively impeding Donnarumma’s ability to react to Van Dijk’s header. Former Manchester United captain and Sky Sports pundit Gary Neville voiced strong criticism of the decision, stating that Robertson’s position did not materially affect Donnarumma’s view of the ball and that the goalkeeper would have been unlikely to save the shot regardless. Similarly, former England international Wayne Rooney, also analyzing the game for Sky Sports, echoed Neville’s sentiments, describing the decision as "harsh" and "unjustified."

Related News :

The laws of the game, as interpreted by the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), state that a player in an offside position is only penalized if they are actively interfering with play by either: (a) preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or challenging an opponent for the ball; or (b) making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball.

The crux of the debate lies in the subjective interpretation of whether Robertson’s ducking motion constituted an "obvious action" that impacted Donnarumma’s ability to play the ball. While the laws do not explicitly require proof that the goalkeeper would have saved the shot absent the offside interference, the consensus among many observers was that Donnarumma’s chances of reaching the ball were minimal, irrespective of Robertson’s presence.

In the aftermath of the match, Van Dijk was questioned about his thoughts on the disallowed goal. However, the Dutch international was reluctant to be drawn into a lengthy discussion about the incident, preferring to focus on the broader context of Liverpool’s performance and the need for improvement.

"In football, the officials make key decisions, and we have to deal with them on the pitch," Van Dijk told Sky Sports. "There is no point discussing it from my point of view. The reality is we lost 3-0, and that is a tough blow. It doesn’t matter what I say about the goal because whatever I say will be in the media, and the whole international break will be filled with comments about my opinion on the decision. I am just focused on the fact that we lost. You can debate whether the goal should have stood."

Van Dijk’s reluctance to dwell on the disallowed goal reflects a desire to avoid further fueling the controversy and instead concentrate on addressing the underlying issues that contributed to Liverpool’s heavy defeat. The loss leaves Liverpool languishing in seventh place in the Premier League table, a significant departure from their title-challenging form of recent seasons.

The defeat against Manchester City was particularly disappointing given Liverpool’s recent run of inconsistent form. Prior to the match, they had secured a hard-fought victory against Tottenham Hotspur at Anfield, but had also suffered a shock defeat away to newly-promoted Nottingham Forest. The team’s defensive frailties have been a recurring concern, with Liverpool conceding a higher number of goals than would typically be expected of a side with their ambitions.

Liverpool’s attacking output has also been a source of frustration for manager Jurgen Klopp. While the team possesses a wealth of attacking talent, including Mohamed Salah, Darwin Nunez, and Luis Diaz, they have struggled to consistently convert chances into goals. The absence of Sadio Mane, who departed for Bayern Munich in the summer of 2022, continues to be felt, with Liverpool yet to fully replace his dynamism and goalscoring prowess.

The upcoming international break provides Klopp with an opportunity to reassess his team’s tactics and personnel. He will be hoping that his players return from international duty fit and refreshed, ready to mount a sustained challenge for a top-four finish in the Premier League. Liverpool’s next fixture is a home game against Aston Villa, a match they will be desperate to win to reignite their season.

Statistically, Liverpool’s current form represents a significant decline compared to previous seasons. In the 2023-24 season, they finished second in the Premier League, amassing 92 points and boasting the best defensive record in the division. However, their current points tally is significantly lower at this stage of the season, and their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed on numerous occasions.

Furthermore, Liverpool’s goalscoring record has also declined. In the 2023-24 season, they averaged over two goals per game, but their current average is significantly lower, highlighting their struggles in the final third. The team’s reliance on individual brilliance from players like Salah has become more pronounced, with a lack of consistent creativity and cohesion in their attacking play.

The disallowed goal controversy, while undoubtedly frustrating for Van Dijk and Liverpool, ultimately pales in significance compared to the team’s broader struggles. Addressing their defensive frailties, improving their attacking efficiency, and fostering a greater sense of collective responsibility will be crucial if Liverpool are to salvage their season and compete for major honors. Van Dijk’s decision to focus on the team’s overall performance rather than the contentious refereeing decision reflects a pragmatic approach aimed at addressing the root causes of their recent struggles.

💬 Tinggalkan Komentar dengan Facebook

Author Profile

Ahmad Zein Salamo: Ahmad Zein Salamo is a dedicated football journalist at Sports News Break, covering the global game with a sharp eye for detail and passion for storytelling. With years of experience following Europe’s top leagues and international tournaments, he delivers insightful analysis, match previews, and breaking news with journalistic integrity and depth.

His reporting combines tactical understanding with a human perspective, highlighting not only the drama on the pitch but also the stories that shape the sport beyond it. From Champions League nights to grassroots football, Ahmad’s work reflects a true love for the beautiful game and a commitment to bringing readers closer to the action.