23XI and Front Row Racing Narrow Antitrust Focus in NASCAR Legal Battle

In a significant strategic shift ahead of a looming trial, NASCAR Cup Series teams 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports have voluntarily withdrawn a key component of their antitrust lawsuit against the sanctioning body. The teams have opted to proceed solely with their Section 2 Sherman Antitrust Act claims, dropping the previously asserted Section 1 allegations. This decision, filed with the Charlotte federal court, aims to streamline the complex legal proceedings and focus the upcoming December 1, 2025, trial on the core issue of alleged monopolization by NASCAR.

The lawsuit, which centers on allegations that NASCAR has engaged in anticompetitive practices that harm independent race teams, was initiated by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports. The original complaint included claims under both Section 1 and Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Section 1 of the act broadly prohibits contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade. In the context of this lawsuit, the Section 1 claim likely pertained to alleged agreements or understandings between NASCAR and its affiliated entities, such as International Speedway Corporation (ISC) prior to their merger, that were seen as anticompetitive. These could involve practices like price-fixing or bid-rigging, although the specifics of the teams’ Section 1 allegations were not detailed in the publicly available filings.

Conversely, Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act addresses more direct assertions of market dominance and anticompetitive conduct by a single entity. It prohibits monopolization, or attempts or conspiracies to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several states. The teams’ continued focus on Section 2 implies their legal strategy will now concentrate on proving that NASCAR, as a singular entity, has wielded its market power in a manner that unfairly stifles competition and harms independent teams like 23XI and Front Row. This could involve arguments that NASCAR’s control over key aspects of the sport, such as race scheduling, track ownership, charter system, and the distribution of revenue, creates barriers to entry and disadvantages for teams not aligned with NASCAR’s favored interests.

The decision to dismiss the Section 1 claim comes after a series of judicial rulings that have shaped the trajectory of the case. Notably, a Charlotte federal judge recently ruled in favor of 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports regarding the market definition for the lawsuit. This ruling is crucial as it establishes the scope of the market within which the alleged antitrust violations occurred, providing a foundation for the teams’ arguments. Furthermore, the dismissal of NASCAR’s counterclaims the week prior to the Section 1 withdrawal signaled a favorable development for the plaintiff teams, potentially bolstering their confidence in pursuing the remaining claims.

Related News :

In their motion to voluntarily dismiss the Section 1 claim, the plaintiffs, 2311 Racing LLC d/b/a/ 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, Inc., explicitly stated their intention to "streamline the issues for trial." The filing reads: "Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), and in order to streamline the issues for trial, Plaintiffs 2311 Racing LLC d/b/a/ 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, Inc. move the Court for an order voluntarily dismissing, with prejudice, Count Two of their Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 107) (the ‘Section 1 claim’), asserted against all Defendants. Plaintiffs are voluntarily dismissing their Section 1 claim so that the upcoming December 1, 2025, trial can focus on Plaintiffs’ Section 2 monopolization claim." The phrase "with prejudice" means the Section 1 claim cannot be refiled in the future.

This strategic refinement suggests that the legal teams for 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports believe their Section 2 monopolization case is stronger or more readily provable, or that the complexity of the Section 1 claim could potentially detract from the core arguments concerning NASCAR’s alleged unilateral anticompetitive conduct. By narrowing the scope, the teams aim to present a more focused and compelling case to the jury, potentially increasing the likelihood of success.

The lawsuit’s roots trace back to the fundamental structure of NASCAR and its business model. NASCAR, as the primary sanctioning body for stock car racing in North America, holds immense influence over the sport. This includes ownership and operation of numerous tracks, control over the rules and regulations, and the establishment of a system for team participation. The "charter system," introduced in recent years, has been a significant point of contention. Charters essentially guarantee teams a starting spot in every Cup Series race and a share of the series’ revenue. However, these charters are limited in number and can be bought and sold, creating a tiered system that some argue disadvantages smaller or newer teams.

23XI Racing, co-owned by NBA legend Michael Jordan and NASCAR driver Denny Hamlin, entered the Cup Series in 2021. The team has quickly established itself as a competitive force, with drivers Bubba Wallace and Tyler Reddick securing victories. Front Row Motorsports, a long-standing competitor, has also seen periods of success, notably with Michael McDowell’s historic Daytona 500 win in 2021. Despite their competitive achievements, both teams, like others operating outside the direct influence of the largest, most established organizations, have voiced concerns about the fairness of NASCAR’s business practices.

The core of the Section 2 monopolization claim is likely to revolve around how NASCAR allegedly uses its dominant position to maintain its monopoly power. This could involve arguments that NASCAR:

Controls Access to Key Resources: By controlling track access, race dates, and the distribution of sponsorship and media revenue, NASCAR might be accused of unfairly disadvantaging teams that do not align with its preferred business model.
Manipulates the Charter System: The charter system, while providing stability for some, could be argued to create an artificial scarcity and inflate the value of these charters, making it exceedingly difficult for new teams to enter and compete on an equal footing.
Engages in Predatory Pricing or Practices: While less common in this context, the claim could encompass instances where NASCAR’s actions are seen as designed to drive out competition or prevent the emergence of alternative racing series or team models.
Leverages Market Power Across Different Segments: NASCAR’s involvement in various aspects of the racing ecosystem, from car manufacturing partnerships to merchandise, could be scrutinized to see if it uses its power in one area to gain an unfair advantage in another.

The upcoming trial is expected to involve extensive testimony from key figures within NASCAR and the sport’s major teams. Notably, prominent team owners such as Rick Hendrick and Roger Penske are slated to be deposed as part of the pretrial discovery process. Their insights into the inner workings of NASCAR and the business of team ownership will be crucial for both sides. Hendrick Motorsports and Team Penske are among the most successful and influential organizations in NASCAR, and their perspectives on the sport’s economic structure and competitive landscape will carry significant weight.

The legal battle between these independent teams and NASCAR highlights a long-standing tension in professional sports, particularly in racing, where the sanctioning body often wields considerable power over the participants. The outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for the future of team ownership, competition, and revenue distribution within NASCAR. By focusing on the Section 2 monopolization claim, 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports are signaling a clear intent to challenge NASCAR’s fundamental control over the sport and its alleged impact on the competitive balance. The narrowing of the legal focus sets the stage for a pivotal trial that will scrutinize the very foundations of NASCAR’s business empire.