The controversy gained public traction following comments made by Justin Gaethje at a UFC 324 Media Day event. Gaethje, a prominent figure in the lightweight division, stated that despite the UFC’s new, highly lucrative media rights deal with Paramount, valued at approximately $7.7 billion over multiple years, his personal compensation had not seen an increase. This assertion directly contradicted earlier public statements by Daniel Cormier, who, leveraging his position as a UFC Hall of Famer and commentator, had previously indicated that the promotion was now offering more substantial remuneration to its athletes, particularly since the traditional pay-per-view (PPV) model has evolved.
The dispute escalated into a direct confrontation during Fight Week, captured in a clip subsequently posted on Cormier’s YouTube channel. Gaethje confronted Cormier with sharp accusations regarding the accuracy of his claims. "You’re out here saying everybody’s getting paid more and you’re f*cking lying!" Gaethje exclaimed during their exchange. "Why would you say that? Why would you talk out of your ass when you have no idea what’s happening."
Cormier, a seasoned media personality, attempted to defend his position, responding, "I actually know." However, Gaethje pressed the issue, questioning rhetorically, "Oh, you know that I’m getting paid more than I would have if this deal didn’t happen?" The conversation continued with Gaethje vehemently insisting that Cormier had stated "every, single guy will be getting paid more!" a claim Cormier denied, saying, "I never said everybody." The back-and-forth highlighted the raw emotion surrounding the perennial issue of fighter pay in mixed martial arts. "You’re gonna throw us under the bus and make us look stupid!" Gaethje insisted, to which Cormier retorted, "I didn’t not throw you under the bus." Gaethje concluded his argument by stating, "We’re not getting paid more, why would you say that? You might be getting paid more! And I hope you are." Cormier, attempting to lighten the mood, slyly remarked, "I don’t get paid nothing. I do this for free. I do this to help you. I love you so I do this." Gaethje’s final retort underscored his belief: "See, that’s how you lie to the people. Just like that."
While the interaction between the two friends was largely described as good-natured, underlying tensions regarding a deeply sensitive financial issue were evident. The public disagreement quickly drew a response from UFC CEO Dana White, who offered a different perspective on Gaethje’s situation. White stated that the promotion had indeed attempted to update Gaethje’s current contractual agreement, but that "he and his team never responded" to the offer. This counter-narrative from the UFC’s leadership adds a layer of complexity to the ongoing discussion, suggesting a potential breakdown in communication or negotiation between the fighter and the organization.
Related News :
- Nittany Lions Stun No. 2 Hoosiers in Thrilling Week 11 Upset
- Tom Aspinall Prioritizes Undisputed Heavyweight Title Defense Against Ciryl Gane, Moves Past Jon Jones Narrative
- Pochettino Affirms Meritocracy as USMNT World Cup Roster Battle Intensifies
- UFC 320 Betting Insights: Deep Dive into Main Card Prop Bets for Ankalaev-Pereira Rematch and Dvalishvili-Sandhagen Title Bout
- UFC 323: Bantamweight Title Rematch Headlines Las Vegas Showdown Amidst Broadcast Transition
The Broader Context of UFC Fighter Pay
The exchange between Gaethje and Cormier is not an isolated incident but rather a microcosm of a much larger, ongoing debate within the mixed martial arts community regarding fighter compensation. For years, the UFC has faced scrutiny over its revenue-sharing model, particularly when compared to other major professional sports leagues globally. In leagues such as the NBA, NFL, and MLB, players typically receive between 48% and 50% of the league’s total revenue. In contrast, estimates for UFC fighter revenue share have consistently placed it significantly lower, often in the range of 15-20%. This disparity has fueled persistent calls for increased transparency and improved compensation for athletes who bear the physical risks of the sport.
The recent $7.7 billion multi-year media rights deal with Paramount Global, announced in 2024, was widely anticipated to usher in an era of greater financial prosperity for the promotion and, by extension, its fighters. This deal, which encompasses broadcast and streaming rights across various platforms, represents a substantial increase in guaranteed revenue for the UFC. Many, including commentators like Cormier, interpreted this as a clear indicator that the financial tide would turn in favor of the athletes. Cormier’s earlier statements, such as revealing "inside knowledge of new UFC contracts" and saying "they are giving these guys more money," likely stemmed from this expectation and his proximity to the organization’s inner workings.
However, Gaethje’s direct refutation highlights that the benefits of such lucrative deals may not be uniformly distributed, or at least, not immediately apparent to all fighters, even those at the upper echelon of the sport. As a former interim lightweight champion and a consistent main event or co-main event draw, Gaethje is considered one of the sport’s elite performers. His record of 25 wins and 4 losses, including victories over prominent fighters like Dustin Poirier, Tony Ferguson, and Michael Chandler, underscores his value to the promotion. If a fighter of Gaethje’s caliber has not experienced a pay increase, it raises questions about the financial outlook for less established fighters on the roster.
The evolution of the PPV model also plays a role in this discussion. While top-tier fighters traditionally earned significant portions of their income through PPV points, the increasing prevalence of subscription-based streaming services and bundled broadcast deals has altered revenue streams. Fighters and their teams are keen to understand how these new models translate into their individual contracts, especially if the traditional PPV upside diminishes for some.
Justin Gaethje’s Upcoming Challenge at UFC 324
The timing of this dispute is particularly significant as Gaethje prepares for one of the most crucial fights of his career. At UFC 324, scheduled for this Saturday, he is slated to face rising star Paddy Pimblett for an interim lightweight title. The winner of this bout will likely position themselves for a unification fight against the undisputed lightweight champion, further elevating their profile and potential earning power. Gaethje’s focus leading into this high-stakes contest is ostensibly divided between his preparations for Pimblett and the public discourse surrounding his compensation.
The main event status of his fight against Pimblett in a marquee event like UFC 324 underscores Gaethje’s importance to the promotion. His comments during Media Day also included a defense of Dustin Poirier against Pimblett’s criticism, with Gaethje vowing, "I’m going to dog walk this English f*ck," demonstrating his typical outspoken confidence and willingness to engage in verbal sparring, not just with fellow fighters but also with figures like Cormier on sensitive topics.
Daniel Cormier’s Role and Perspective
Daniel Cormier, a former UFC Light Heavyweight and Heavyweight Champion, transitioned seamlessly into a role as a commentator and analyst for the promotion following his retirement from active competition. His "insider" status often positions him as a bridge between the organization and the fighter community. However, this position also means he is often caught between advocating for fighters and representing the company line. His attempt to clarify his statements by saying, "I never said everybody," indicates a recognition of the nuance required when discussing such a broad and sensitive topic. His playful remark about doing his commentary work "for free" was likely an attempt to deflect the tension, but Gaethje’s sharp retort highlighted that the issue was too serious for lighthearted dismissal from his perspective.
The Unresolved Debate
The public spat between Justin Gaethje and Daniel Cormier, coupled with Dana White’s intervention, serves to reignite the persistent conversation around fighter pay in the UFC. It underscores the challenges faced by athletes in understanding and negotiating their worth within a rapidly evolving sports entertainment landscape. As UFC 324 approaches, the spotlight remains not only on the highly anticipated interim lightweight title fight but also on the economic realities that shape the careers of the elite athletes competing inside the Octagon. The resolution of this specific dispute, and its broader implications for fighter compensation, will continue to be a closely watched development within the mixed martial arts world.
💬 Tinggalkan Komentar dengan Facebook
Author Profile
Latest entries
MMAJanuary 23, 2026Aspinall and Gane Set to Clash for Undisputed Heavyweight Gold at UFC 321 in Abu Dhabi
MMAJanuary 23, 2026Morning Report: Justin Gaethje, ‘lying’ Daniel Cormier argue about UFC fighter pay comments
MMAJanuary 23, 2026UFC 322: Welterweight Champion Jack Della Maddalena Prepares for Marquee Clash Against Lightweight King Islam Makhachev.
MMAJanuary 23, 2026Luis Aguiar Targets LFA Interim Flyweight Title as Crucial Step Towards UFC Roster Spot.








