Makhachev's Welterweight Coronation Reshapes Divisional Landscape, Igniting Debates on Multi-Weight Champions

Islam Makhachev cemented his legacy this past weekend at UFC 322, securing his second UFC title with a commanding performance over Jack Della Maddalena. The dominant victory has not only crowned Makhachev a dual-division champion but has also triggered widespread discussion across the combat sports world regarding the welterweight title picture and the broader implications of fighters pursuing multiple divisional championships. The bout drew comparisons to Khamzat Chimaev’s suffocating win over Dricus du Plessis earlier this year, prompting a closer examination of tactical approaches in elite wrestling encounters.

Islam Makhachev and Jack Della Maddalena: A Masterclass in Control

The main event of UFC 322 saw Islam Makhachev (currently 26-1 MMA, 15-1 UFC) assert his wrestling and grappling dominance over Jack Della Maddalena (17-3 MMA, 7-1 UFC), a highly touted striker known for his offensive prowess. Makhachev’s performance was a calculated dismantling, leading to his second UFC title and marking him as one of the sport’s most formidable figures. The victory extended Makhachev’s impressive winning streak, showcasing an evolved skillset that translated effectively to the welterweight division.

Post-fight analysis of Makhachev’s triumph over Della Maddalena has garnered varied interpretations within the mixed martial arts community. While some initial assessments suggested a perceived underperformance from Della Maddalena, a closer review of the contest reveals a more nuanced narrative: a testament to Makhachev’s exceptional preparation and execution rather than a failure of Della Maddalena’s strategy or readiness.

Related News :

Upon re-examination, Della Maddalena’s efforts from the bottom position were consistently active. He demonstrated continuous movement, actively fighting for hand control and attempting to create space for scrambles – techniques that had previously afforded him success in high-level competition. However, Makhachev proved to be a step ahead at every turn, systematically nullifying each attempt before Della Maddalena could generate any meaningful offense. This anticipatory defense, likened by some to "reading his mind," prevented Della Maddalena from utilizing his customary tools to initiate scrambles, a critical component of his ground game.

This dynamic suggests that Della Maddalena and his team made a strategic decision in the fight’s build-up. Acknowledging Makhachev’s elite wrestling, their apparent focus shifted from counter-wrestling – an area not considered Della Maddalena’s primary strength and one where Makhachev is exceptionally proficient – towards enhancing his scrambling abilities, a domain where Della Maddalena already excels. This tactical gamble, while logical, ultimately failed to account for Makhachev’s superior ability to shut down even the most refined ground escapes. The visible frustration on Della Maddalena’s face by the fifth round underscored the futility of his efforts against Makhachev’s impenetrable defense.

In contrast, the recent bout between Khamzat Chimaev and Dricus du Plessis presented a different tactical breakdown. Du Plessis appeared to lack diverse responses to Chimaev’s grappling assault, exhibiting fewer varied attempts at creating scrambles. His performance was characterized by a more defensive, survival-oriented posture, suggesting a rapid depletion of viable strategies once his initial plan to match Chimaev’s physicality and stuff takedowns proved ineffective. Du Plessis’s defeat stemmed from a quick exhaustion of ideas, whereas Della Maddalena’s loss was attributed to Makhachev having a prepared and effective counter for every one of his opponent’s well-conceived plans.

The Shifting Welterweight Title Picture

With Islam Makhachev now holding the welterweight championship, the landscape of the 170-pound division has entered a period of significant flux. The question of his next opponent is a primary topic of debate among fans and analysts.

Currently, former welterweight champion Kamaru Usman (20-4 MMA, 15-4 UFC) has emerged as a prominent figure in the contender conversation. Usman’s recent public statements and his team’s lobbying efforts for a title shot have been notable, receiving support from Makhachev himself and his camp. UFC President Dana White’s recent commendation of Usman as "the greatest welterweight of all time," despite its debatable accuracy given his record, is seen by many as a strategic promotional move by the organization to build interest in a potential matchup.

Despite Usman’s momentum, the welterweight title picture remains highly fluid, with the next challenger likely determined by a confluence of scheduling considerations and fighter merit. A merit-based approach would logically prioritize contenders who have earned their shot through consistent performance.

One such contender is Shavkat Rakhmonov (18-0 MMA, 6-0 UFC). Rakhmonov was previously slated for a title eliminator against Belal Muhammad, a fight that fell through due to Muhammad’s withdrawal. Rakhmonov’s decision to remain on the card and secure a victory, albeit with an injury, positions him as a strong candidate. A championship bout between Islam Makhachev and Shavkat Rakhmonov would represent a compelling clash of elite skills and a deserved opportunity for the undefeated Kazakh fighter.

For Kamaru Usman, a decisive win over Joaquin Buckley (18-6 MMA, 8-4 UFC) may not suffice for an immediate title shot. A more appropriate booking could see Usman face the winner of the upcoming bout between Belal Muhammad (23-3, 1 NC MMA, 14-3, 1 NC UFC) and Ian Machado Garry (14-0 MMA, 7-0 UFC). Such a matchup would not only offer Usman a more significant challenge but also capitalize on his existing rivalry with Muhammad, or provide a critical test for the ascending Garry if he were to win.

Further down the contender ladder, a fight between Michael Morales (16-0 MMA, 5-0 UFC) and Carlos Prates (19-6 MMA, 2-0 UFC) represents an intriguing prospect. Morales, fresh off a victory over Sean Brady (16-1 MMA, 6-1 UFC), has demonstrated significant potential. While an immediate title shot may be premature, a matchup with Prates, another rising talent, would undoubtedly deliver an exciting contest and further clarify the pecking order in the division.

Regarding a potential "super fight" between Islam Makhachev and featherweight champion Ilia Topuria (15-0 MMA, 7-0 UFC), such a bout remains a persistent point of discussion among fans. However, its immediate likelihood appears low. Makhachev has indicated no intention of returning to the lightweight division, and a move by Topuria up to welterweight would involve a significant size disparity. Topuria, while an exceptional featherweight, is not naturally a welterweight, making such a contest potentially less competitive than anticipated. While the lightweight division might have benefited from Topuria’s presence in Makhachev’s absence, the welterweight division currently boasts a robust roster of contenders.

The Triple Champ Phenomenon: Benefits and Drawbacks

The pursuit of multiple divisional championships, often referred to as "champ-champ" status, has become a significant talking point in modern MMA. The recent trend has seen champions challenging in different weight classes, leading to various outcomes and raising questions about divisional integrity.

The visual of champions posing with two belts is a natural consequence of their achievement in securing titles across different weight categories. However, the broader implications of these cross-divisional pursuits warrant further scrutiny. The notion of fighters vacating titles to move up in weight, for instance, has often been a distinction in name only. As exemplified by Zhang Weili’s (25-3 MMA, 9-2 UFC) recent decision to potentially return to strawweight after a loss in a higher division, such movements can create temporary champions in divisions where the "real" champion has simply moved on without truly being defeated. This often leads to interim titles or perceived "second-best" champions, potentially diminishing the prestige of the belts.

A potential solution to mitigate divisional stagnation and uphold the competitive integrity of weight classes could involve implementing a policy requiring champions to achieve a certain number of successful title defenses before being permitted to challenge in another division. A benchmark of four successful title defenses, for example, would represent an extraordinary accomplishment, signifying true dominance within a weight class. Only 19 fighters in UFC history have achieved four or more successful title defenses (20 if Tyron Woodley’s draw is counted as a defense). This threshold would ensure that a champion has thoroughly proven themselves against their division’s top contenders before pursuing accolades elsewhere.

Such a rule would not only establish a more meritorious path to multi-divisional challenges but also enhance fan engagement. Imagine a scenario where a fighter like Merab Dvalishvili (17-4 MMA, 10-2 UFC), instead of merely rematching Petr Yan (16-5 MMA, 8-5 UFC), is fighting for the opportunity to challenge at featherweight after four defenses. This structure could inject new excitement into title defenses and streamline divisional progression.

Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua: A Boxing Mismatch

The hypothetical boxing bout between internet personality turned boxer Jake Paul (9-1, 6 KOs) and former unified world heavyweight champion Anthony Joshua (28-3, 25 KOs) has generated significant public interest, despite the vast disparity in their professional boxing pedigrees.

From a purely analytical standpoint, the only conceivable scenario for a Jake Paul victory would involve an extraordinary and highly improbable event: Paul landing a single, perfectly timed overhand right that results in a knockout of Anthony Joshua. Paul, while having demonstrated serviceable boxing skills against a particular demographic of opponents (often former MMA fighters or other internet personalities), does not possess the foundational technique or power to genuinely compete with a top-tier heavyweight boxer like Joshua. Joshua, a legitimate and still active contender in the heavyweight division, operates at a significantly higher level of skill, experience, and physical prowess. The fight is, by all professional boxing metrics, a profound mismatch.

The strategic rationale behind Paul pursuing such a bout, assuming it materializes, appears to be a calculated "cash-out" moment in his unique career trajectory. Paul has meticulously built his brand by facing opponents perceived as beatable, generating substantial financial returns and media attention. A fight against Joshua represents an undeniable step up in competition against a globally recognized boxing icon. Should Paul lose, as is overwhelmingly expected, he can frame the defeat as a valiant effort against a far superior, legitimate heavyweight champion – a narrative that would likely garner him respect for "daring to be great." This outcome would then provide a foundation to resume his prior strategy of targeting older or less-experienced combatants, or to seek another high-profile, commercially lucrative bout against a figure like Canelo Alvarez, without significant damage to his overall career narrative or earning potential.

Conclusion

The aftermath of UFC 322 has underscored several critical themes in combat sports: the tactical genius of fighters like Islam Makhachev, the ever-evolving landscape of title contention, the allure and challenges of multi-divisional championships, and the intricate business calculus behind high-profile crossover fights. As the UFC continues to navigate these dynamics, the discussions surrounding merit, legacy, and divisional health will undoubtedly persist, shaping the future of the sport.