Ali Akbar Rosady
UFC 324, scheduled for Saturday night, marks the commencement of the promotion’s landmark seven-year, $7.7 billion broadcast deal with Paramount. This agreement signifies a significant shift in the UFC’s distribution strategy, migrating all its events, including traditionally numbered pay-per-view (PPV) cards that previously retailed for $79.99, to the Paramount+ streaming service. Historically, a subset of UFC fighters, particularly champions and top draws, benefited from "pay-per-view points," a contractual provision that allowed them to earn additional income based on the sales performance of their respective events. This revenue stream, often constituting a substantial portion of a fighter’s overall compensation, is now rendered obsolete under the new streaming-exclusive model.
In the lead-up to this pivotal transition, UFC CEO Dana White has repeatedly assured the fighter roster and the public that the new broadcast deal would result in a general increase in fighter pay. These assurances were echoed by Daniel Cormier, a respected analyst and former champion, who publicly claimed, "they’re already getting more money," while also suggesting that the promotion was demonstrating a greater willingness to negotiate revised contract terms in light of the discontinuation of the PPV system. Cormier’s comments, often informed by his continued proximity to the organization, suggested a positive trajectory for athlete earnings within the new framework.
However, Gaethje, a former interim lightweight champion and one of the sport’s most consistently exciting performers, offered a starkly contrasting perspective during UFC 324 media day. "I hear Daniel Cormier saying everybody is going to get paid more on this card," Gaethje stated, directly referencing Cormier’s comments. He then delivered his unequivocal counter-assertion, underscoring his personal experience: "I’m not getting one dollar more than I would have if this deal did not happen." This direct contradiction from a main event participant introduces a layer of skepticism regarding the universality of the promised pay increases.
The implications of Gaethje’s statement are significant, particularly for a fighter of his caliber who frequently features in high-profile bouts. While the precise details of individual fighter contracts are not publicly disclosed, the question of whether Gaethje was historically a recipient of pay-per-view bonuses remains pertinent. Typically, such bonuses are reserved for UFC champions and a select group of elite contenders whose drawing power is deemed sufficient to drive PPV sales. Even for those eligible, contract clauses often stipulate that PPV sales must surpass a predetermined threshold before additional payouts are triggered. The removal of the PPV points system necessitates a re-evaluation of how top-tier fighters, who previously benefited from this model, will be compensated under the new streaming-centric paradigm.
Related News :
- Shifting Tides: UFC 323 Sees Two Champions Dethroned in Unprecedented Night of Upsets
- Terence Crawford Delivers Fiery Rebuke After WBC Strips Super Middleweight Title Over Sanctioning Fees
- Light Heavyweight Title Rematch Anchors UFC 320 in Las Vegas as Ankalaev Faces Pereira II.
- Georgia’s Defensive Fortress Poses Critical Test for Texas’ Playoff Hopes
Gaethje’s career in the UFC is notable not only for his thrilling fighting style but also for his exceptional record of performance bonuses. Across 14 appearances inside the Octagon, Gaethje has earned a remarkable 14 post-fight bonuses, a testament to his consistent delivery of memorable performances. These bonuses, often awarded for "Fight of the Night," "Performance of the Night," or "Knockout/Submission of the Night," are designed to incentivize exciting contests and exceptional finishes. Despite this unparalleled bonus accumulation, Gaethje expressed profound dissatisfaction with his overall earnings.
"To have 14 bonuses and not equal up to a million dollars is not right," Gaethje asserted, articulating a broader frustration with the financial structure of the sport. He elaborated on this sentiment, stating, "It’s not right. It should be a lot more than that and I should have had opportunities to do smarter things with my money but I don’t and I haven’t." This comment suggests a perception that his contributions to the promotion, particularly through his consistently bonus-winning performances, have not translated into a commensurate level of career earnings that would facilitate long-term financial security and diversified investment opportunities.
A closer examination of Gaethje’s bonus history provides concrete figures to support his claim. Out of his 14 bonuses, 13 were awarded at the standard rate of $50,000 each, totaling $650,000. His most recent bonus, a "Fight of the Night" accolade from his highly anticipated bout against Max Holloway at UFC 300, was a more substantial $300,000. Combined, these bonuses amount to $950,000, falling short of the $1 million mark that Gaethje believes he should have surpassed given his consistent bonus-earning record. This shortfall underscores his argument that even exceptional performance in the Octagon, as recognized by the promotion’s bonus system, may not translate into the substantial wealth often associated with elite professional sports.
Despite his grievances regarding overall compensation, Gaethje acknowledged the practical utility of the bonus money he has received throughout his career, particularly in terms of family support and strategic investments. "I’m happy to achieve what I have achieved," Gaethje stated, reflecting on his journey. He highlighted prudent financial decisions made possible by his earnings: "The best thing I did was probably invest in a commercial property. I purchased a house in Arizona that’s like a mile away from my parents. My sister’s renting that from me now." These investments, he explained, were primarily aimed at providing for his family.
Gaethje further emphasized the personal value derived from being able to financially assist his loved ones. "Really just being able to help my family. Help my parents, help my brothers and sisters. Give them Christmas gifts that I would have never been able to give them. Take them on vacations that I never would have been able to," he recounted. For Gaethje, these experiences represent an invaluable return on his efforts, stating, "That’s the smartest thing I did because you can never get that time back with your family. It’s huge for me." This perspective offers a glimpse into the personal motivations behind his pursuit of fighting and how the financial rewards, despite his broader criticisms, have positively impacted his immediate family.
Gaethje’s remarks reignite a long-standing debate within the combat sports industry concerning fighter compensation and the allocation of revenue generated by major promotions. For years, the UFC has faced scrutiny over the percentage of its overall revenue that is distributed to its athletes, with some critics arguing that the share is significantly lower than in other major professional sports leagues. The transition to a streaming-exclusive model, while providing the UFC with a guaranteed and substantial revenue stream from Paramount, also removes the direct link between a fighter’s individual drawing power and their potential for incremental earnings via PPV buys. This shift could disproportionately affect top-tier fighters who previously commanded a share of PPV revenue, potentially leading to increased demands for higher guaranteed purses.
The new deal presents both opportunities and challenges for the UFC and its roster. While the promotion gains financial stability and broader audience reach through Paramount+, the onus is now on the organization to demonstrate how this increased revenue translates into improved compensation for its fighters across all tiers. Gaethje’s specific claim, coming from a main event fighter on the inaugural card of this new era, serves as a significant data point in this ongoing discussion. His voice adds weight to the arguments for greater transparency and more equitable pay structures within the sport, particularly as the UFC embarks on a new chapter in its broadcast history. The outcome of these discussions and the ultimate impact on fighter earnings will be closely watched by athletes, fans, and industry observers alike as UFC 324 ushers in the Paramount+ era.
💬 Tinggalkan Komentar dengan Facebook
Author Profile
Latest entries
MMAJanuary 22, 2026UFC 322: Welterweight Gold on the Line as Della Maddalena Defends Against Ascendant Makhachev
MMAJanuary 22, 2026Justin Gaethje disputes higher fighter pay under UFC deal with Paramount: ‘I’m not getting $1 more’
MMAJanuary 21, 2026UFC 323 Readies for Bantamweight Championship Showdown as Merab Dvalishvili Faces Petr Yan in Highly Anticipated Rematch
MMAJanuary 21, 2026Paramount+ Era Commences as UFC 324 Features Gaethje-Pimblett Interim Lightweight Title Bout
arthur roy sitompul
Anshari Taslim
rifan muazin
Jonas Leo