Eddie Kingston Voices Strong Disapproval Over WWE's Wrestlepalooza Timing Against AEW All Out

The professional wrestling landscape is poised for a significant head-to-head confrontation this Saturday as All Elite Wrestling (AEW) stages its highly anticipated All Out pay-per-view, concurrently with World Wrestling Entertainment’s (WWE) inaugural Wrestlepalooza event. This scheduling conflict has ignited a debate within the industry regarding competitive practices, with AEW talent Eddie Kingston, set to make his return from a year-long injury layoff at All Out, publicly criticizing WWE’s timing as an attempt to undermine the rival promotion.

The two events are set to unfold on the same day, marking a rare direct clash between the industry’s two largest North American entities. While AEW’s All Out, a flagship pay-per-view for the Jacksonville-based promotion, was booked and announced months in advance, WWE’s Wrestlepalooza was unveiled approximately one month prior to the scheduled date. This late announcement, coupled with a card featuring high-profile returns such as Brock Lesnar and AJ Lee, alongside appearances by John Cena and CM Punk, has been widely interpreted as a strategic move by WWE to draw attention and viewership away from AEW’s major event.

Industry analysts have frequently pointed to such scheduling conflicts as tactics employed to fragment viewership and market share, particularly when a larger, established entity aims to mitigate the growth of a challenger. WWE, with its decades of dominance and global reach, has historically held a commanding position in the sports entertainment market. However, AEW, founded by entrepreneur Tony Khan in 2019, has rapidly established itself as a credible alternative, cultivating a dedicated fanbase and securing lucrative television deals. The company’s weekly flagship program, AEW Dynamite, consistently draws strong viewership on TNT and TBS, often competing directly with WWE’s NXT brand during the "Wednesday Night Wars" period from 2019 to 2021. While the direct weekly competition has since ceased, the pay-per-view arena remains a battleground for consumer attention and revenue.

In response to WWE’s counterprogramming, AEW leadership, specifically Tony Khan, adjusted the start time for All Out to an earlier 3 p.m. ET, an uncommon slot for a major pay-per-view event, specifically to create a buffer and avoid a direct head-to-head broadcast with Wrestlepalooza. Furthermore, the decision to feature Eddie Kingston’s return, a significant draw for the AEW fanbase given his authentic persona and in-ring intensity, was also factored into the card’s construction to enhance its appeal.

Related News :

Kingston, speaking to CBS Sports, articulated his perspective on the situation, expressing a mix of humility and frustration regarding the broader competitive environment. "Humbly, it’s flattering that they think I matter that much and can help them," Kingston stated, reflecting on his role in AEW’s counter-strategy. "I don’t think too highly of myself. It’s not a beat yourself up thing. I was taught that the meek shall inherit the Earth. So I’m very humbled that they believe I can help in whatever bullshit war or bullshit that’s going on. ‘Cause all it is, is bullshit. It’s competition, and it’s one place wanting to monopolize."

Kingston’s comments underscore a sentiment often discussed within the professional wrestling community: the tension between competitive business practices and the impact on both talent and consumers. His use of strong language reflects a deep-seated belief that the underlying motive behind such scheduling is not merely healthy competition but rather an attempt by a dominant force to consolidate its market control.

Despite his criticism of WWE’s tactics, Kingston refrained from labeling the company as an outright villain. He acknowledged the inherent nature of power dynamics within large corporations, suggesting that "power corrupts," and admitted he could not be certain that AEW, if in a similar position of industry dominance, would not engage in comparable strategies. This nuanced perspective highlights a pragmatic understanding of corporate behavior within a highly competitive entertainment sector. Kingston’s acceptance of how corporations function, however, did not extend to fan behavior, as he urged wrestling enthusiasts not to adopt a similar corporate mindset. He emphasized that while supporting a specific promotion or "team" is a natural inclination, fostering healthy competition ultimately benefits both the consumers, who receive a higher quality and more diverse product, and the workers, who benefit from increased opportunities and leverage.

Kingston drew upon historical examples from professional wrestling to illustrate his point about the advantages of a diverse and competitive landscape. He recounted his own experiences during the famed "Monday Night Wars" of the late 1990s, when World Championship Wrestling (WCW) directly challenged WWE’s dominance. "WCW came with Nitro, and they had the cruiserweights. I remember them putting Brian Pillman and Jushin Thunder Liger on. I was stuck watching it," Kingston recalled, highlighting the compelling product offered by the competing promotion. He then posed a rhetorical question to illustrate the potential loss for fans who restrict their viewing based on promotional loyalty: "Imagine if I had said, ‘No! They’re WCW. I’m not watching it. I hate them!’ I would have missed Rey Mysterio, Psichosis, Dean Malenko and Eddie Guerrero. Imagine if I never saw the NWO or Hulk Hogan turning heel because I cut myself off?" This anecdote serves as a powerful reminder of how competition can spur innovation and deliver unforgettable moments that define an era, enriching the fan experience across the board. The cruiserweight division, the formation of the New World Order (NWO), and the iconic heel turn of Hulk Hogan were all pivotal developments that drove the wrestling boom of that period, directly fueled by the intense rivalry between WWE and WCW.

Kingston further elaborated on his desire for a thriving, multi-faceted wrestling industry. "I don’t want any place to close," he affirmed, despite his current affiliation with AEW. He clarified his critical remarks about WWE as a natural expression of loyalty to his current employer rather than deep-seated personal animosity. "Am I going to talk shit about WWE? Yes! Why? ‘Cause I’m not there and I’m with the other team right now. That’s it. There’s no hatred. I have friends there, and I don’t have a lot of friends. But the people I do consider friends, some of them are there. Do you think I want them to be out of a job? Hell no." This statement humanizes the competitive dynamic, emphasizing that beneath the corporate rivalry, there exists a shared community of professional wrestlers whose livelihoods depend on the health and stability of the entire industry.

The upcoming Saturday showdown between AEW All Out and WWE Wrestlepalooza is therefore more than just a clash of events; it is a microcosm of the ongoing competitive dynamics in professional wrestling. For AEW, All Out represents a critical opportunity to showcase its growth and solidify its position as a major player, featuring key talent returns and high-stakes matchups. For WWE, Wrestlepalooza, with its star-studded lineup and strategic timing, aims to reassert its market dominance and potentially test the waters for new event concepts. As fans prepare to choose their viewing allegiance, or attempt to navigate both offerings, Eddie Kingston’s candid remarks serve as a poignant commentary on the intricate balance between fierce corporate competition and the collective well-being of the wrestling world. The outcome of this weekend’s viewership figures and public reception will undoubtedly provide further insights into the evolving landscape of professional wrestling.